UK becomes first country to map and estimate carbon stored in seabeds

UK becomes first country to map and estimate carbon stored in seabeds

Charities urge stronger protection for UK seas - including the North Sea - as new reports reveal amount of carbon stored in UK seabed habitats following world-first research.
  • New series of reports – The Blue Carbon Mapping Project – provide the first estimate of carbon stored in UK seabed habitats, including in Marine Protected Areas (MPAs).
     
  • 37.4 million tonnes of organic carbon* are stored in just the top 10cm of seabed sediments (principally made of mud) in the North Sea, plus coastal habitats including saltmarshes and seagrass beds. 
     
  • UK seabed habitats could capture up to 13 million tonnes of organic carbon every year – almost three times the amount sequestered by the UK’s forests.
     
  • Seabed disturbances, including from bottom trawling and offshore development, are identified as threats to blue carbon stores, as nature charities call for stronger protections for UK seas.  

A new series of reports published today by a coalition of nature charities means the UK is the first nation to map and estimate the amount of carbon stored in its seabed habitats, including in Marine Protected Areas (MPAs).  

The report is part of The Blue Carbon Mapping Project, completed by the Scottish Association for Marine Science (SAMS) on behalf of WWF-UK, The Wildlife Trusts and the RSPB. The series of reports mean the UK is the first nation to map and estimate the amount of carbon stored in its seabed habitats, including within Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). 

The report reveals that 37.4 million tonnes of organic carbon* are stored in just the top 10cm of seabed sediments – principally made of mud – in the North Sea. 

The North Sea covers 114,000 square kilometres. This vast area is host to habitats that capture and store carbon, known as ‘blue carbon’. They include seabed sediments (made of mud, silt and sand), vegetated habitats (seagrass meadows, saltmarshes, kelp forests and intertidal seaweeds), maerl beds and biogenic reefs, such as mussel beds and honeycomb worm reefs. 

Carbon is primarily absorbed by phytoplankton, which drift to the bottom of the sea when they die and are added to seabed sediment. The research analysed the storage capacity of just the top 10cm of sediment. Some sediments are hundreds of metres thick and contain millennia’s worth of carbon, so the total carbon stored will be far greater. The Blue Carbon Mapping Project highlights how physical disturbances to the seabed, including from human activity such as bottom trawling, as well as moorings and offshore developments, pose threats to blue carbon stores. Disturbing seabed habitats can release large amounts of carbon into the atmosphere, worsening climate change. 

WWF, The Wildlife Trusts, and the RSPB are calling on governments across the UK to strengthen protections for valuable blue carbon stores – including in MPAs – by minimising the impacts of human activities on the seabed. Most MPAs were not designated to protect blue carbon, and failing to protect these areas from disturbance could threaten climate and biodiversity goals – including net-zero and protecting 30% of seas by 2030. 

Download the North Sea Technical Summary

Download the full North Sea Assessment Report

Download the full UK Seas Assessment Report

Grey seal

Grey seal - Mark Thomas

WWF, The Wildlife Trusts and the RSPB are calling for: 

Better management of MPAs 
  • Ensure that all MPAs are protected from destructive activities that damage blue carbon habitats and threaten marine life. 

  • Account for both carbon and biodiversity in designating new protected areas, to support ecosystem resilience and the role seas play in climate mitigation. 

Improved strategic planning of activities in UK seas 
  • Consider blue carbon in UK marine plans, avoiding damaging activities in MPAs and other key areas for blue carbon and wildlife that are not protected. 

  • Minimise the impacts of fishing and developments by undertaking blue carbon impact assessments. 

  • Support a just transition for fishing industries away from activities that damage the seabed.  

More investment and research on protecting blue carbon 
  • Allocate funding to restore habitats including seagrass beds and saltmarshes. 

  • Support research and monitoring of blue carbon dynamics. 

  • Add seagrass and saltmarsh to the Greenhouse Gas Registry to track and monitor emissions.  
     

Suffolk’s newest MPA, Orford Inshore Marine Conservation Zone (MCZ), was designated in 2019 to protect sedimentary habitats on the seabed 14km off the coast of the Alde Ore Estuary; which are important as nursery and spawning grounds for many fish, including Dover sole, lemon sole and sandeels, as well as supporting anemones, sea cucumbers and starfish, alongside several nationally important shark species. The Blue Carbon Mapping Project has now also shown their importance as natural carbon stores – and their vulnerability to damaging activities like bottom trawling. 

Ben McFarland, Director of Wildlife Conservation & Recovery at Suffolk Wildlife Trust says: “The findings of this project are a reminder of the vital role nature can play in helping us tackle the climate and biodiversity crises. The Government must end practices that damage our natural environment and must work in better partnership with nature which – as the reports prove – is a critical ally in achieving net-zero targets. Five years on from its designation, we are still waiting for Orford Inshore to have a management plan to regulate potentially harmful activities. These reports underline the importance of good management for our MPAs and I hope they will help provide the impetus needed to get plans in place for this and other sites that don’t yet have them.”

Joan Edwards, Director of Marine Policy at The Wildlife Trusts, says: “These world-first reports reveal the enormous value of UK seas, while highlighting that many areas need far better protection. We need strategic decision-making from policymakers to recognise the value of blue carbon by minimising the impact of human activities on the seabed. Damaging activities such as bottom trawling must not take place in protected areas. This research gives the UK an opportunity to lead the world in protecting blue carbon and marine biodiversity.”  

Tom Brook, blue carbon specialist at WWF-UK, says: “This project reveals how critical our seas are in regulating the climate and underscores the urgent need to protect and restore our seabed habitats. While saltmarshes and kelp forests punch above their weight in terms of capturing carbon, the mud really is the star here – accumulating and storing vast amounts on the seabed. But we need to make sure it goes undisturbed for it to fulfil this critical function by preventing harmful activities such as bottom trawling, starting with our Marine Protected Areas.” 
 
Kirsten Carter, Head of UK Marine Policy at the RSPB, says: “Accelerating efforts on land to tackle the nature and climate emergency is critical, but we must not underestimate the role of UK seas. This report is a gamechanger for our knowledge of the marine environment and a huge asset for decision-makers. Now we need them to act on its findings. To meet net zero and stop biodiversity decline we must work with nature, not against it. This means restoring habitats, properly planning offshore development, and investing in protected areas to safeguard wildlife and keep blue carbon locked up.” 
 
Professor Mike Burrows, Scottish Association for Marine Science, says: “Understanding how much and where our marine carbon is stored is vital for guiding efforts to maintain and protect the capacity of coastal and seabed habitats to continue to serve this function. Saltmarshes and seagrass beds are significant carbon storage hotspots, while kelp beds and especially phytoplankton contribute large amounts of organic carbon annually. However, the exact fraction of this carbon that is stored in sediments remains uncertain. By consolidating various information sources, we have gained valuable insights into our coastal seabed. This process has also highlighted significant gaps in our knowledge regarding the rates of carbon accumulation in sediments.” 

 

*Please note that organic carbon should not be converted into carbon dioxide equivalent in this instance due to the complex interaction of atmospheric carbon and the ocean.